Speaker summary
⁠71%1 analyzed article/video512 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victoria Coats results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Authority, and Optimism Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 28.9% saturation with 146 hits. Analysis detected 1,389.715 faulty-reasoning hits from 512 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠11% (24,035 of 26,858 speakers). This Victoria Coats is better (less manipulative) than 89.50% of the peer group.
Victoria Coats
Speaker details
Total words: 512
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

11% percentile
025507510010.5% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos512 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 28.9%28.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.9%27.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 20.8%20.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 17.9%17.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 19.9%19.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 21.8%21.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 15.1%15.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 6.5%6.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 28.9%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.9%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 21.8%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 20.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 1.1%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 19.9%, sitewide 9.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 19.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 15.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 4.0%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 0.6%Halo Effect: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anecdotal: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 3.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos