Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video45.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Garcia results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and In-Group Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 45.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (7,083 of 28,364 speakers). This Victor Garcia is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the peer group.
Victor Garcia
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠75%Victor Garcia (selected)60%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 45.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.0% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos45.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 50.0%50.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos