Speaker summary
85% 1 analyzed article/video 520 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Victor Davis Hansen results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Overconfidence Bias , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 44% saturation with 229 hits . Analysis detected 1,712 faulty-reasoning hits from 520 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 10% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,145 of 28,364 speakers). This Victor Davis Hansen is better (less manipulative) than 88.70% of the peer group. Victor Davis Hansen
Speaker details
Total words: 520
Video count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.3% percentile 10.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos520 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 44.0% 44.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 22.5% 22.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 17.9% 17.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 28.5% 28.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 9.6% 9.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.0%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.5%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 22.5%, sitewide 4.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 11.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 11.5%, sitewide 6.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 9.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 2.2% Halo Effect: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 6.5%, sitewide 3.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 6.0% Bandwagon: Speaker 6.0%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Speaker 5.4%, sitewide 0.4% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 5.0%, sitewide 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst