Speaker summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video67 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vaughan Gilmore results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.7% saturation with 42 hits. Analysis detected 142.405 faulty-reasoning hits from 67 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,288 of 28,364 speakers). This Vaughan Gilmore is worse (more manipulative) than 53.20% of the peer group.
Vaughan Gilmore
Speaker details
Total words: 67
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.2% percentile
34.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos67 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 45.4%45.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 47.7%47.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 37.5%37.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 47.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 45.4%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 9.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos