Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video19 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vasilj results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 19 hits. Analysis detected 57 faulty-reasoning hits from 19 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,599 of 28,364 speakers). This Vasilj is worse (more manipulative) than 83.80% of the peer group.
Vasilj
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 19
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510083.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos19 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos