Speaker summary
⁠33%1 analyzed article/video60.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Varonis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Recency Bias, and Primacy Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 48.3% saturation with 69 hits. Analysis detected 107 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠30% (19,977 of 28,364 speakers). This Varonis is better (less manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group.
Varonis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 60.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

30% percentile
025507510029.6% percentile
18.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos60.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 48.3%48.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 7.7%7.7%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 48.3%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%Primacy Effect: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos