Speaker summary
ā 29%1 analyzed article/video111.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Merlano Sittauer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 21.4% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 170 faulty-reasoning hits from 111.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 16.2% and a BS Rank of ā 25% (21,346 of 28,364 speakers). This Vanessa Merlano Sittauer is better (less manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Vanessa Merlano Sittauer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 25%Vanessa Merlano Sittauer (selected)17%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 111.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

25% percentile
025507510024.7% percentile
16.2% BS Score1 analyzed videos111.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 21.4%21.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 21.4%21.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.9%11.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 14.3%14.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 21.4%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 11.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 11.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos