Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video62.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Hudson results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Primacy Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 85.1% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 141 faulty-reasoning hits from 62.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠52% (13,781 of 28,364 speakers). This Vanessa Hudson is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group.
Vanessa Hudson
Speaker details
Total words: 62.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510051.4% percentile
33.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos62.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 85.1%85.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 42.5%42.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 14.9%14.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 7.5%7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 7.5%7.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Framing Effect: Speaker 85.1%, sitewide 26.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 42.5%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Speaker 14.9%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos