Speaker summary
⁠35%1 analyzed article/video720 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Vanessa Emlich results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 611.927 faulty-reasoning hits from 720 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠1% (28,159 of 28,364 speakers). This Vanessa Emlich is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the peer group.
Vanessa Emlich
Speaker details
Total words: 720
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

1% percentile
02550751000.7% percentile
3.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos720 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 3.3%3.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 0.7%0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 7.4%7.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.3%5.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 7.3%7.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 5.6%5.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 7.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 7.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.6%Slippery Slope: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos