Speaker summary
⁠56%1 analyzed article/video41.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Valentina Paloma Pinault results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including In-Group Bias, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Emotion, with Unattributed Quote as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 134 faulty-reasoning hits from 41.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 55.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,569 of 28,364 speakers). This Valentina Paloma Pinault is worse (more manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group.
Valentina Paloma Pinault
Speaker details
Total words: 41.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

73% percentile
025507510073.3% percentile
55.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos41.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 60.4%60.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 39.6%39.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 39.6%39.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%In-Group Bias: Speaker 60.4%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 39.6%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos