Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video70.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Utilities Department results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 218.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (7,898 of 42,587 speakers). This Utilities Department is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Utilities Department
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠82%Utilities Department (selected)75%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 70.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos70.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos