Speaker summary
83% 1 analyzed article/video 166 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Usha Rackliffe results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 52.3% saturation with 86.788 hits . Analysis detected 579.454 faulty-reasoning hits from 166 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.1% and a BS Rank of 30% (18,774 of 26,836 speakers). This Usha Rackliffe is better (less manipulative) than 70.00% of the peer group. Usha Rackliffe
Speaker details
Total words: 166
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.0% percentile 19.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos166 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 52.3% 52.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 47.4% 47.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Speaker 21.1% 21.1% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.5% 10.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 19.5% 19.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 25.4% 25.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 20.3% 20.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Optimism Bias: Speaker 52.3%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 47.4%, sitewide 8.1% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.4%, sitewide 15.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 21.1%, sitewide 0.5% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.3%, sitewide 11.1% Loss Aversion: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 2.5% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 19.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 14.1%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.8% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst