Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video29 analyzed words
BS Summary: These USAID results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 87 faulty-reasoning hits from 29 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠84% (4,527 of 28,364 speakers). This USAID is worse (more manipulative) than 84.00% of the peer group.
USAID
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 29
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.0% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos29 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos