Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Energy Information Agency results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias and Recency Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 196 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 88.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠83% (4,902 of 28,364 speakers). This US Energy Information Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 82.70% of the peer group.
US Energy Information Agency
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

83% percentile
025507510082.7% percentile
88.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 64.9%64.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Speaker 64.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos