Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video73 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Central Command (Centcom) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 18.5% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 67 faulty-reasoning hits from 73 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 18% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (18,865 of 26,155 speakers). This US Central Command (Centcom) is better (less manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
US Central Command (Centcom)

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510027.9% percentile
18.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos73 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.6%18.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.6%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos