Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US air force results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and Special Pleading, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 88 hits. Analysis detected 151 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (11,232 of 28,364 speakers). This US air force is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
US air force
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

60% percentile
025507510060.4% percentile
42.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos58.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.4%28.4%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 21.6%21.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 28.4%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 3.7%Special Pleading: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos