Speaker summary
⁠66%1 analyzed article/video178 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Appeal to Authority, with Quote-first Misdirection as the most egregious example at 38.2% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 159 faulty-reasoning hits from 178 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,113 of 28,364 speakers). This United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California is better (less manipulative) than 63.90% of the peer group.
United States Attorney's Office for the Central District of California
Speaker details
Total words: 178
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

36% percentile
025507510036.1% percentile
22.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos178 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 38.2%38.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 21.9%21.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 38.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 11.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos