Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Nations Human Rights Office results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 195 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,479 of 28,364 speakers). This United Nations Human Rights Office is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
United Nations Human Rights Office
Speaker details
Total words: 39
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos39 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos

CBC | Soccer News⁠13%
CBC⁠49%7/14/2026, 1:49:45 AM