Speaker summary
ā 86%1 analyzed article/video23 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Nations health agency results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 23 hits. Analysis detected 46 faulty-reasoning hits from 23 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ā 85% (4,477 of 28,364 speakers). This United Nations health agency is worse (more manipulative) than 84.20% of the peer group.
United Nations health agency
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 85%United Nations health agency (selected)100%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 23
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

84% percentile
025507510084.2% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos23 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Burden of ProofSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos