Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos62 analyzed words
BS Summary: These United Democracy Project results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Quote-first Misdirection, and Biased Writer Voice, with Tu Quoque as the most egregious example at 91.2% saturation with 56.529 hits. Analysis detected 348.529 faulty-reasoning hits from 62 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 79.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (4,884 of 26,155 speakers). This United Democracy Project is worse (more manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group.
United Democracy Project
Speaker details
Total words: 62
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510081.3% percentile
79.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos62 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 91.2%91.2%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 82.3%82.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Tu Quoque: Speaker 91.2%, sitewide 0.2%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 5.3%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 82.3%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 3.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos