Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video89.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Udo Recker results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 82.8% saturation with 111 hits. Analysis detected 399 faulty-reasoning hits from 89.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,890 of 28,364 speakers). This Udo Recker is worse (more manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Udo Recker
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 89.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

62% percentile
025507510061.6% percentile
44.9% BS Score1 analyzed videos89.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 82.8%82.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 65.7%65.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 65.7%65.7%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 32.8%32.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 17.2%17.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.2%17.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 82.8%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 65.7%, sitewide 4.6%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 65.7%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 8.1%Primacy Effect: Speaker 32.8%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos