Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video63 analyzed words
BS Summary: These UC Davis results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Begging the Question, and Framing Effect, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 89 hits. Analysis detected 237 faulty-reasoning hits from 63 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠78% (6,360 of 28,364 speakers). This UC Davis is worse (more manipulative) than 77.60% of the peer group.
UC Davis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 63
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

78% percentile
025507510077.6% percentile
66.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos63 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 83.2%83.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 41.6%41.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 41.6%41.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 83.2%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 41.6%, sitewide 26.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos