Speaker summary
⁠86%2 analyzed articles/videos60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. intelligence community results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 88 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 73.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (5,684 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. intelligence community is worse (more manipulative) than 80.00% of the peer group.
U.S. intelligence community
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.0% percentile
73.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 46.7%46.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos