Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 69% saturation with 29 hits. Analysis detected 71 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 56.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (7,491 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is worse (more manipulative) than 73.60% of the peer group.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

74% percentile
025507510073.6% percentile
56.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 69.0%69.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 30.9%30.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 69.0%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 30.9%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos