Speaker summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video105.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These U.S. Attorney Pirro results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 85.1% saturation with 89.748 hits. Analysis detected 351.145 faulty-reasoning hits from 105.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,556 of 28,364 speakers). This U.S. Attorney Pirro is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
U.S. Attorney Pirro
Speaker details
Total words: 105.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
33.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos105.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 85.1%85.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 54.2%54.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 23.6%23.6%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 22.4%22.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 23.6%23.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 37.2%37.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 10.4%10.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 34.0%34.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.5%12.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 85.1%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 54.2%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity Bias: Speaker 37.2%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 22.4%, sitewide 1.5%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 7.5%Begging the Question: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos