Speaker summary
71% 1 analyzed article/video 427.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Cobb results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 271 hits . Analysis detected 2,197.228 faulty-reasoning hits from 427.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,811 of 28,364 speakers). This Ty Cobb is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group. Ty Cobb
Speaker details
Total words: 427.667
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.6% percentile 17.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos427.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Speaker 30.4% 30.4% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Speaker 25.6% 25.6% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 22.6% 22.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 28.3% 28.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 24.4% 24.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 28.8% 28.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Speaker 22.1% 22.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 29.0% 29.0% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Speaker 14.5% 14.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 32.0% 32.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 19.2% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 4.0% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 8.1% Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 5.3% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 7.5% False Dilemma: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.4% Recency Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst