Speaker summary
71%1 analyzed article/video427.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ty Cobb results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Biased Writer Voice, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 271 hits. Analysis detected 2,197.228 faulty-reasoning hits from 427.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (20,811 of 28,364 speakers). This Ty Cobb is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Ty Cobb
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 427.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

27% percentile
025507510026.6% percentile
17.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos427.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 30.4%30.4%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 25.6%25.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 22.6%22.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 28.3%28.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 24.4%24.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 28.8%28.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.0%29.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.5%14.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 32.0%32.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 38.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 19.2%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 30.4%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 28.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 28.3%, sitewide 8.1%Slippery Slope: Speaker 25.6%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 24.4%, sitewide 5.3%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 22.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 7.5%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.5%, sitewide 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 12.9%, sitewide 3.1%Burden of Proof: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.4%Recency Bias: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.3%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.6%, sitewide 1.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos