Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video68.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These TWU Local 100 results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Status Quo Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 122 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (16,666 of 27,830 speakers). This TWU Local 100 is better (less manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
TWU Local 100
Speaker details
Total words: 68.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.1% percentile
25.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos68.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 28.7%28.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 21.3%21.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 28.7%28.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 26.9%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 28.7%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 21.3%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos