Speaker summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video44 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tucker Stone results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 33 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 44 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (10,005 of 28,364 speakers). This Tucker Stone is worse (more manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group.
Tucker Stone
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 44
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

65% percentile
025507510064.7% percentile
50.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos44 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.5%Halo Effect: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos