Speaker summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video196 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tristan Aureau results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.7% saturation with 105 hits. Analysis detected 404.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 196 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,004 of 28,364 speakers). This Tristan Aureau is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Tristan Aureau
Speaker details
Total words: 196
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos196 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 44.4%44.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 36.0%36.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 35.7%35.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 25.5%25.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%No True ScotsmanSitewide 0.1%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.8%7.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 44.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 35.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 25.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%No True Scotsman: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos