Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video108 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Triple Oak Power results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anchoring Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 46.3% saturation with 50 hits. Analysis detected 237 faulty-reasoning hits from 108 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,396 of 28,364 speakers). This Triple Oak Power is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the peer group.
Triple Oak Power
Speaker details
Total words: 108
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

49% percentile
025507510049.2% percentile
31.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos108 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Speaker 46.3%46.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 46.3%46.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Speaker 26.9%26.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.1%23.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 26.9%26.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 46.3%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Speaker 26.9%, sitewide 4.0%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Speaker 23.1%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos