Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video88 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Trevor Timm results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Confirmation Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 70.5% saturation with 69.75 hits. Analysis detected 367.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 88 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,242 of 28,364 speakers). This Trevor Timm is better (less manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Trevor Timm
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠50%Trevor Timm (selected)32%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 88
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.8% percentile
31.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos88 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 70.5%70.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 30.3%30.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 39.4%39.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 19.7%19.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 70.5%, sitewide 3.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 39.4%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 30.3%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 8.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 19.7%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos