Speaker summary
⁠49%1 analyzed article/video556.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tracy Walder results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Pessimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 961.558 faulty-reasoning hits from 556.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (26,229 of 27,524 speakers). This Tracy Walder is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Tracy Walder
Speaker details
Total words: 556.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos556.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 9.8%9.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 8.0%8.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 13.1%13.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 14.0%14.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 4.0%4.0%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Speaker 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 12.0%12.0%Personal IncredulitySitewide 0.2%Speaker 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 13.2%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 13.1%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 12.0%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 1.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Slippery Slope: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 1.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 0.3%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Personal Incredulity: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 0.2%Ad Hominem: Speaker 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos