Speaker summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos104 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Touch Sokhak results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Special Pleading, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 273 faulty-reasoning hits from 104 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of ⁠54% (13,162 of 28,364 speakers). This Touch Sokhak is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Touch Sokhak
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 104
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

54% percentile
025507510053.6% percentile
35.0% BS Score2 analyzed videos104 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 25.0%25.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Optimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 11.1%Special Pleading: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.3%Tu Quoque: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos