Speaker summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video143.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Popovic results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 17.3% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 193 faulty-reasoning hits from 143.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠13% (24,688 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Popovic is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Tony Popovic
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 143.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
10.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos143.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 17.3%17.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.2%10.2%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 12.4%12.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 5.8%5.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 17.3%, sitewide 0.6%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos