Speaker summary
⁠80%2 analyzed articles/videos103.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony McCombie results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Straw Man, Negativity Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with False Dilemma as the most egregious example at 57% saturation with 58.938 hits. Analysis detected 247.772 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.333 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠32% (19,457 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony McCombie is better (less manipulative) than 68.60% of the peer group.
Tony McCombie
Speaker details
Total words: 103.333
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

31% percentile
025507510031.4% percentile
19.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos103.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 57.0%57.0%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 27.4%27.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 18.1%18.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 15.2%15.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.4%8.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 16.9%16.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%False Dilemma: Speaker 57.0%, sitewide 1.5%Straw Man: Speaker 27.4%, sitewide 0.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 19.2%Tu Quoque: Speaker 18.1%, sitewide 0.2%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 15.2%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 6.9%False DilemmaSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos