Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video226.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tony Curtis results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 50.2% saturation with 204 hits. Analysis detected 630.215 faulty-reasoning hits from 226.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,254 of 28,364 speakers). This Tony Curtis is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
Tony Curtis
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 226.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
31.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos226.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 59.1%59.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.3%50.3%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 40.9%40.9%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 39.9%39.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 28.6%28.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 10.3%10.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 13.8%13.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 11.3%11.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 59.1%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.3%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 40.9%, sitewide 1.4%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 39.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Speaker 28.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 13.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 11.3%, sitewide 11.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos