Speaker summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tonda Eckert results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 63.7% saturation with 65 hits. Analysis detected 120.75 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (14,296 of 28,364 speakers). This Tonda Eckert is better (less manipulative) than 50.40% of the peer group.
Tonda Eckert
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.6% percentile
31.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos68 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 63.7%63.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 32.4%32.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 63.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 32.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 5.9%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos