Speaker summary
ā 28%1 analyzed article/video134.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tomasz Niedzielski results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Begging the Question and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 134.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 21.8% and a BS Rank of ā 36% (18,387 of 28,364 speakers). This Tomasz Niedzielski is better (less manipulative) than 64.80% of the peer group.
Tomasz Niedzielski
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 36%Tomasz Niedzielski (selected)22%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 134.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

35% percentile
025507510035.2% percentile
21.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos134.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 23.3%23.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 23.3%23.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 11.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Speaker 18.8%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos