Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video48 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Souzzi results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 48 hits. Analysis detected 144 faulty-reasoning hits from 48 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,356 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Souzzi is worse (more manipulative) than 84.60% of the peer group.
Tom Souzzi
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 48
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.6% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos48 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 3.3%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos