Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hanchett results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 50.131 hits. Analysis detected 203.131 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (20,415 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Hanchett is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Tom Hanchett
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠28%Tom Hanchett (selected)18%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
17.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 55.7%55.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 17.8%17.8%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 23.3%23.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 5.5%5.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 11.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8%Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos