Speaker summary
ā 80% 1 analyzed article/video 90 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Hanchett results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Anecdotal , and Availability Heuristic , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 55.7% saturation with 50.131 hits . Analysis detected 203.131 faulty-reasoning hits from 90 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.8% and a BS Rank of ā 28% (20,415 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom Hanchett is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Tom Hanchett
Speaker details
Total words: 90
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 17.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos90 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 55.7% 55.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 17.8% 17.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 23.3% 23.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 11.6% 11.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 55.7%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 23.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 8.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.8% Indoctrination: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst