Speaker summary
⁠87%1 analyzed article/video129 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom Bareric results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 129 hits. Analysis detected 516 faulty-reasoning hits from 129 analyzed words across 1 video, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,388 of 28,836 speakers). This Tom Bareric is worse (more manipulative) than 84.80% of the peer group.
Tom Bareric
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 129
Video count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.8% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos129 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Anecdotal: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 6.0%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos