Speaker summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video31 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tom and Lynne Pike results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Negativity Bias, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 31 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 31 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠85% (4,342 of 28,364 speakers). This Tom and Lynne Pike is worse (more manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group.
Tom and Lynne Pike
Speaker details
Total words: 31
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

85% percentile
025507510084.7% percentile
100.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos31 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos