Speaker summary
⁠36%1 analyzed article/video91.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tokyo Fire Department results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 42.1% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 332 faulty-reasoning hits from 91.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 38.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (12,155 of 28,364 speakers). This Tokyo Fire Department is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Tokyo Fire Department
Speaker details
Total words: 91.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

57% percentile
025507510057.1% percentile
38.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos91.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 29.0%29.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 42.1%42.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 29.0%29.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 19.2%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 4.6%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 42.1%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 11.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 29.0%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos