Speaker summary
79%5 analyzed articles/videos197.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Blanch results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Halo Effect, with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 818.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,621 of 28,364 speakers). This Todd Blanch is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group.
Todd Blanch
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 197.667
Content count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

20% percentile
025507510020.2% percentile
14.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos197.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 21.0%21.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 19.8%19.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 20.5%20.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 16.1%16.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 26.2%26.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 16.9%16.9%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Speaker 10.6%10.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 15.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.4%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 3.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 19.2%Anecdotal: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.4%Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.6%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Begging the Question: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate