Speaker summary
79% 5 analyzed articles/videos 197.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Todd Blanch results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Halo Effect , with Burden of Proof as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 77 hits . Analysis detected 818.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 197.667 analyzed words across 5 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.1% and a BS Rank of 21% (22,621 of 28,364 speakers). This Todd Blanch is better (less manipulative) than 79.80% of the peer group. Todd Blanch
Speaker details
Total words: 197.667
Content count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.2% percentile 14.1% BS Score5 analyzed videos197.7 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Speaker SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 21.0% 21.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 19.8% 19.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Speaker 20.5% 20.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 18.5% 18.5% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 26.2% 26.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 16.9% 16.9% Actor-Observer Bias Sitewide 0.6% Speaker 10.6% 10.6% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Speaker 11.2% 11.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 16.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 26.2%, sitewide 15.9% Burden of Proof: Speaker 21.0%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 20.5%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 19.8%, sitewide 3.7% Negativity Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 19.2% Anecdotal: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Speaker 16.9%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 2.7% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 7.5% Hindsight Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.4% Slippery Slope: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Speaker 10.6%, sitewide 0.6% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 1.7% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 6.9% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 7.1%, sitewide 1.1% Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst