Speaker summary
⁠47%1 analyzed article/video146.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tobias Tingleaf results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Slippery Slope, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.7% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 152.331 faulty-reasoning hits from 146.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠22% (22,212 of 28,364 speakers). This Tobias Tingleaf is better (less manipulative) than 78.30% of the peer group.
Tobias Tingleaf
Speaker details
Total words: 146.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

22% percentile
025507510021.7% percentile
14.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos146.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Speaker 20.7%20.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.7%17.7%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 8.6%8.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Slippery Slope: Speaker 20.7%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 17.7%, sitewide 7.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos