Speaker summary
⁠59%1 analyzed article/video85.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tiziano Breda results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 71.9% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 253 faulty-reasoning hits from 85.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 44.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠62% (10,977 of 28,364 speakers). This Tiziano Breda is worse (more manipulative) than 61.30% of the peer group.
Tiziano Breda
Speaker details
Total words: 85.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

61% percentile
025507510061.3% percentile
44.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos85.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–100%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 71.9%71.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 36.0%36.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 14.0%14.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 71.9%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 36.0%, sitewide 11.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 14.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos