Speaker summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothy Garton Ash results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Unattributed Quote, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 135 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (5,612 of 28,364 speakers). This Timothy Garton Ash is worse (more manipulative) than 80.20% of the peer group.
Timothy Garton Ash
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

80% percentile
025507510080.2% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos