Speaker summary
⁠28%1 analyzed article/video64 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothee Chalamet results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Quote-first Misdirection and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 65 faulty-reasoning hits from 64 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 22.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (18,020 of 28,364 speakers). This Timothee Chalamet is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group.
Timothee Chalamet
Speaker details
Total words: 64
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.5% percentile
22.6% BS Score1 analyzed videos64 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 25.0%25.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 36.5%36.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 36.5%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 25.0%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos