Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Stockwell results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Quote-first Misdirection, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 63.2% saturation with 68.25 hits. Analysis detected 264.014 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (13,320 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Stockwell is worse (more manipulative) than 53.00% of the peer group.
Tim Stockwell
Speaker details
Total words: 96
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

53% percentile
025507510053.0% percentile
34.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos96 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 46.8%46.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 63.2%63.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 57.3%57.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 25.7%25.7%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 12.5%12.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 23.6%23.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Negativity Bias: Speaker 63.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 57.3%, sitewide 15.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 46.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing Effect: Speaker 23.6%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 1.1%Tu Quoque: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos