Speaker summary
ā 70%2 analyzed articles/videos232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tim Canterbury results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 53.3% saturation with 139.125 hits. Analysis detected 506.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 232 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 15.3% and a BS Rank of ā 23% (21,840 of 28,364 speakers). This Tim Canterbury is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group.
Tim Canterbury
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 23%Tim Canterbury (selected)16%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

23% percentile
025507510023.0% percentile
15.3% BS Score2 analyzed videos232 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0ā€“75%
0.0%20%40%60%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 53.3%53.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 18.4%18.4%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 18.0%18.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Speaker 6.6%6.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 21.6%21.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 8.6%8.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 9.8%9.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 53.3%, sitewide 3.7%Framing Effect: Speaker 21.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 18.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 18.0%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Speaker 8.6%, sitewide 0.9%Primacy Effect: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.6%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos